Monday, July 23, 2012

Gene Finally (starts to) Tell the Truth

Gene Bourne trashing me:

"I am your friend" weaseled his way onto the site* of my last poem.
Happy Hiram gained entry to my last post on
YAP through "a friend contact".(I'm Contacts Only). He used
my Contact to access my site and my poem.
There he proceeded to humiliate and embarrass me publicly.
These "friends of Hiram" (longtime Contacts of mine) I've had to
remove and block, with sad regret. I warned them
last year, when they opened their web site
with Hiram, that It violated my principles
of good judgment and jeopardized
my trust in them as contacts.
I had a long time friend die the day before,
...and allowing Hiram access to my poem
cemented my decision to drop and block them.
You are judged by the company you keep.
HH has shown himself repeatedly to be a sadistic,
sociopath and predator.
I don't consider myself special, but
I won't be made a fool of.
I had a belly full of that, growing up
in a family, where certain members
were bent on destroying my self esteem and confidence.
If it weren't for an understanding father, they would have destroyed me.
There is no more room in my mind for being bullied.
"Solace Befriends, I am your friend, etc" is no true friend of anyone,
...and friends of Hiram's can be no trusted friend of mine.
Thanks for this poem, Beth.
Gene

Here is the question he wrote this in:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aus1IGpH_BqyJ9iLiNWlTXen5HNG;_ylv=3?qid=20120722183424AAcvvv2
(But of course it is gone now. Can't let the TRUTH ruin our image now, can we?)

-------
Well I have to say thank God Gene is finally starting to say the horrible things about me in public that he said to me -unprovoked privately YEARS AGO while pretending to be neutral towards me. EXACTLY GENE, your philosophy of "Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged" is a sham and a manipulation.

* His site being Yahoo Answers. I weaseled my way onto Yahoo? Just a reminder to those who don't remember, I have always said that Gene is a good poet but a lousy human being (to judge by his savage email remarks), and if he added me as a contact (without asking me) because I praised his WORK, in what manner is that weaseling?

I would ask no friend to decide to be my friend over another member because unlike Gene, I DO NOT OWN MY FRIENDS, and my every whim or disagreement does not reflect yea or nay on their character by agreement. That is the style of a dictatorial egotist.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Who is/are Giopeter?

Giopeter was impugning Dallas as the source of Darren Quigley (the false avatar that made accusations that I was a pedophile.) He is carrying the guilt of his internet behavior and trying to displace it AGAIN! Meanwhile he is going around calling himself Harry Codpiece, The Truth and Pandora!

I am sure he has deleted this by now, but here is the poem:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120709110103AAsb3DN

The Truth will Out (Himself)

The Truth will out
Whether slowly or Quigley
No matter how sneaky
Or smart his is or wriggly
No snake can hide forever
Under a codpiece
And peanut butter sticks around
Even where it is wanted least.
Enjoy these words, that he'll defile
Then, I will post it them my profile.
Remember back when speech was free
O, that was before we had Pet- er, I mean since Gio.

He also used the technique of trying to be "scary" as in the example below:

 This "Iamb Yore Wurst Knight Maer" crap becomes boring very Quigley, er I mean quickly.

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Beth is at it again

Beth's Question (removed as soon as she got my email and remembered that I am DOCUMENTING THIS DISTRESS):
"When you are blocked by someone in poetry, do you know why?
I am blocked by HH. And it does bother me, because I don't know what I did. Does anyone ever explain?

[Leaving aside that I told her and her defenders that I put the whole issue up on my blog AT THE TIME I responded as if her ignorance were genuine.]

Email to Beth:
You asked me personal questions in email and I stupidly shared that information. After that when I critiqued your poem you tried to make it a personal issue. WHY would I trust my most personal info with someone I didn't trust and respect? Why was I suddenly the "enemy" when you had information that could damage me?

But basically, now that you "had me" you wanted to manipulate me out of being HONEST. I do not cave to blackmail.

I posted the interchange on my blog so you can read it when you forget:
http://hiramsrants.blogspot.com/2012/06/beth-doesnt-want-to-be-my-friend.html

You emailed me and threatened me, blamed me and blamed feeling "threatened" by me for your "leaving yahoo" (you were posting within a half hour of your "leaving") and you keep backbiting and trying to make me look like the bad guy.

I know you have issues, we all do, but for me to interact with you any more in YA would be frankly suicidal.

I love you as a friend, but you are too unstable in YA for me to cop.

HH
__________________________________________________

Addendum (Not in Email):

If I EVER receive any messages from Beth or I see her posting about me I will update this site so that she can't hit and run, report and then play innocent etc, as she has been doing to me.

NO MORE GAMES PLEASE BETH!

(below is the screen shot of the Q, which she removed to hide her game.)

Please tell me how to feel about your poem

My response to RAYVEN53:
His Q and my Answer:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Av3XnJbLzpOKlYqA4gTAfAzsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20120629100953AAz8rRy

My response:
I AM NOT A CHRISTIAN!!!!!

Ray says: "out of hand! You cannot possibly hope to float the "crap" argument that God MADE the misery we suffer, and then argue against it as sunfish salvation fact, ignoring the metaphor that makes the whole doggone thing neither movement or philosophy in and of itself! The creation argument you proffer is too naive an outlook to even warrant address. If ever you wish to explore the concept of creation and free will and their inextricable interrelationship, you have my email, but I'd prefer you restrict your critique here to my writing, not my heart...IT is sensitive, and I am its fierce protector."

I AM NOT A CHRISTIAN
I DO NOT COUNTENANCE FREE WILL
YOUR ARGUMENTS ARE AS BOGUS
AS YOU SAY MINE ARE.
BUT LETS NOT BE AGREEABLE ABOUT IT
THAT WOULD BE TOO RATIONAL
IT MIGHT MAKE CHRISTIANITY LESS
INSANE AND UNAPPEALING.
WOULDN'T WANT THAT!
TO SAY "ONLY CRITIQUE THE STYLE
AND NOT THE SUBSTANCE"
IS THE MOST BOGUS
"PLEASE READ MY PROPAGANDA
BUT DON'T RUIN ITS EFFECT as PROPAGANDA!"