Can you distinguish the Mark of the Charletan?

[Edit: I do not per se remove old posts as I consider this my internet personal history book, I have apologized for the conflict with Lorry 5 and Breezy 7 and so I ask any readers to take this and the related posts with a huge grain of salt. They speak to my poor behavior as much or more than anyone else's. See the apology: http://hiramsrants.blogspot.com/2014/05/an-apology-sort-of.html ]

Do you know the Mark of the Charletan? 

For Lorry Five "Aussie"* Lily:

Can you distinguish (((((hugs))))) from actual thinking compassion? Is it true that those who preach love and compassion but then slam and abuse others are hypocrites? So is it possible that you can distinguish between people actually trying to be better people from people who are just selling soap because they talk about THEMSELVES trying to be better, rather than saying... "When YOU come from a place of Love, in how YOU treat others aren't YOU really giving YOURself more?" ...instead of talking about themselves. 

It reminds me of the lines from Three Penny Opera... "YOUR vices and OUR virtues are so dear to you..." Always wanting other people to live up to the standards that YOU do not is the mark of the charlatans.

And ultimately you will know them because they can't stop blasting "the sound of their own voice" (i. e. spamming questions) because there is nothing but egotism in their preaching "live". 

I for one think love is an emotion and not a lifestyle. My mistakes are many, but shirking from the truth is not one of them.

*I put "Aussie" in quotes because I don't really believe it. Australia is the land of common sense, not charletan lies.

Threats from the sweetness and light crew

Breezy's friends threatening me:

From: Daniell

Message: Listen to me old son: I can see exactly that you are trying to humiliate these women on yahoo and am telling you again to stop this shit of yours. I'm talking to you in a very nice and decent way now because I believe that this business can be laid to rest peacefully and we can all co-exist peacefully in the philosophy section. But, this will be up to you. I won't make any further comments if you stop with what you are busy, but I'll be watching and getting feed back. And if you touch any of them again, I'll be back on the scene, and I promise you that if I have to return again you're not going to be a happy man any longer.

Hoping that we can bring this matter to a close with mutual understanding and respect.

Daniel

1st: Telling someone to stop spamming is not shit it is ADVICE.

2nd: Breezy has roundly insulted me by email for asking a simple question.

3rd: How can MY words humiliate them unless THEY have done something wrong??

4th:  Talking in swear words about making threats is NOT "mutual understanding and respect" it is what is behind these folks who hog the pages, thugism. 

5th: Are you Dan or Danielle??? Make up your damned mind!

Breezy Seven Files

Long drawn out morning of emails from Breezy Seven. The upshot. If you ask her why she spams Yahoo philosophy she insults you and avoids the question. 

Can one of her friends ask her for me? She seems to be the most closed off negative thinking person I have ever met who preaches Pollyannaism (you know that philosophy that means "SHUT UP SHUT UP YOU ARE MESSING WITH MY DENIAL!") 

I am sure she will answer here with more insults, as she is fond of blocking me in YAP and addressing me here. But double standards are de regueur for Denialist. They love to hear their own voice and can't stand anyone else's. 

Is that what she is? Can somebody (other than her) vouch for her? What is her damage?

Odd behavior for someone who eschews negativity

[Edit: I do not per se remove old posts as I consider this my internet personal history book, I have apologized for the conflict with Lorry 5 and Breezy 7 and so I ask any readers to take this and the related posts with a huge grain of salt. They speak to my poor behavior as much or more than anyone else's. See the apology: http://hiramsrants.blogspot.com/2014/05/an-apology-sort-of.html ]

Breezy:

1. I eschew negativity

2. I block and run without discussion

3. I tell people they should listen to people they are not listening to

4. I rant right in there with the best of them.

5. I point out your foibles instead of my own* and "say" I am going to run and hide as if it were a "new" idea that had just occurred to me.

My response: 

I am not going to excuse my character but to answer your question.  If I said Yahoo was the problem I would be a liar. Yahoo aggravates some flaws in my character, some tendency to want to focus on the behavior of others and thereby avoid looking more at myself, but I like to think I am willing to put it all out there as well. I had a rough childhood and I used to be a homeless alcoholic, so if I "eschew negativity" completely it would require amnesia and also probably kill me. So I think that I have to channel that negativity towards a positive.

A long time ago, that was through intelligent discussions in Yahoo chat. Later it was in Philosophy and in Poetry in Answers. Lately, the place has become a wasteland.  Most of the changes in YA! have been done to prevent "connectivity" that trait which made YA! a community but also made it a target for trolls and spammers.

So the two questions, which I ask rhetorically, are, do we (you and I) add to YA! or are we more a part of the problem, and are our personal strategies working? 

For me, your answers if honest would have to be highly equivocal, as would mine. I am not sure where the line is in social media between defending oneself and doing back what has been done to you.

Whatever your perception of the situation, I wish you well and I advise you to confront negativity, not to try and paper it over. Sometimes negativity is healing and sometimes it is just obligatory. Everything has its shadow, the more so as it is headed towards the light.

*I always tell people that when someone is criticizing someone you will always see they throw in their own failings. There is mine right there. I caught it after the fact, but I will not try and evade pointing it out.

Seriously: questions for Breezy [modified]

[Edit: I do not per se remove old posts as I consider this my internet personal history book, I have apologized for the conflict with Lorry 5 and Breezy 7 and so I ask any readers to take this and the related posts with a huge grain of salt. They speak to my poor behavior as much or more than anyone else's. See the apology: http://hiramsrants.blogspot.com/2014/05/an-apology-sort-of.html ]

Hey listen, as I was writing this I noticed that Breezy has unblocked me. I am still posting my questions, but I will try and move on vis-a-vis Breezy, as perhaps we can settle our differences by just being instead of arguing over fences.

1. What do you (and Lorry 7 Aussie Lily) get out of posting three or four inane questions in a row in the philosophy section pushing off the page all other more meaningful questions and making it look like your own personal scrapbook rather than a Q&A website?

2. Why, if you didn't report my answers making this same complaint, why did you block me at the same time as they were reported?

3. Do you think there is something obscene about pointing out your spamming?

4. Why do you pretend that I blocked you first when you have never once answered a question of mine? How would you KNOW I had you blocked if you never would have TRIED but to answer my complaints in this site.

5. Why do you ask about the damage of not listening to folks while not listening to me? Kind of like an invitation to respond.

The FASTEST troll in the west

[Edit: I do not per se remove old posts as I consider this my internet personal history book, I have apologized for the conflict with Lorry 5 and Breezy 7 and so I ask any readers to take this and the related posts with a huge grain of salt. They speak to my poor behavior as much or more than anyone else's. See the apology: http://hiramsrants.blogspot.com/2014/05/an-apology-sort-of.html ]

This question was pulled from Yahoo Answers FASTER THAN I COULD WRITE IT!

Which one of these is the philosophy Troll (as well as a spamming idiot!)

 Lorry 5 Aussie Lily Or Breezy Seven

(It will be the one whose link stops working in a minute)

My reported post:

Do you get mad that you read a good question once in a while...?  

...and when you go to answer it, can't because the spam-poster has you blocked for telling them to stop filling the screen with nonsense? 

For example: The British quiz show QI says there are nine to thirteen senses (including proximity, balance, hunger and "feeling of self") which one of these is the sixth sense? 

But I can't answer. 

Another one says "What does your avatar say about you?" 

To which I would answer, "that people like you frustrate the heck out of me and that this web site is permanently broken." 

But I can't answer. 

Does this place make you want to bang your head too?

Additional details:
First Troll says: "With answers like that no wonder you are blocked!  {{((hugs)))}}

Every word (seven or eight emails in) is an admission of guilt.

Edit: G. B. claims that this page has "gone viral" and he has had more than 28 separate people email him complaining about it pro or con. In the past week there have been 23 views and half of them were probably HIM reading it over and over. Your "friend" of many Yahoo accounts is lying to you Gene, or else you are lying. I wish my pages would go viral but the only pages that get any traffic are the ones HE reads over and over about HIMSELF. He and you are apparently my only customers.

Gene Bourne keeps writing me exhorting my friendship and complaining that I am posting "private communications". 

Here is my response (which I sent to him):


I am not and never have been your friend. Nothing you say to me is under any condition of privacy. 

If you are not the one who synchronized the report attack on me to coincide with your offensive letter then it is the one person with whom you communicated that you were about to send it. Anything and everythiing you email me that is less than that name is an admission of guilt. 

You think you are so "clever" all the time, do nothing but flatter yourself, insult me and then grovel and say you are ignorant of all things that require cleverness and you then expect something from me of friendship???

What seriously is wrong with your ability to reason and to see yourself as you are? 

Do not write me another word except the name of the person you are in collusion with to attack me. Every other word convicts yourself.

HH